It was inevitable that US Marxhorroids would accuse any and all opposition to Obama of being racist. Seems to me he won a plurality in what is still a largely Caucasian country, hence the majority that opposes his statism must include a considerable number who had and have no problem with his skin colour.
The great majority of that part of the population of the United States classified as 'black' appears to support him unreservedly, but unfortunately that is also the part of the population that is most heavily state-dependent, so there is no conflict there. Indeed, most of those classified as 'black' so commonly vote on colour lines as to fully merit the charge of being themselves deeply racist.
It is also deeply racist to assume that darker skin defines a set of values. I am choosing my words carefully because there are so many gradations in skin colour, and the logic - if one can call it that - of Marxhorroid racism can be fairly equated with the Nazi presumption that a single Jewish grandparent defined the status of the grandchildren.
It was not slavery and the Civil War alone that soured race relations in the USA. They were also, and I believe more harmfully, poisoned by the segregationist 'Jim Crow' laws that the Democratic Party imposed followed the abolition of slavery, which reached their highest point of national acceptance when President Woodrow Wilson applied them in Washington DC.
Yes, that Woodrow Wilson, hero of the 'Progressive' movement, which was openly committed to eugenics - as, indeed, was British Fabianism.
Racism is in the DNA of the 'progressives', which is why they can't stop talking about it. They carry a heavy burden of historical guilt, and their projection of it onto their opponents simply testifies to the intractability of their collective obsession.