The Telegraph reports plans to replace the House of Lords with a chamber of three hundred persons (half of them women) elected by proportional representation.
What's proportional about that? Since, as we all know, 'feminine' and 'masculine' are artificial divisions imposed on society by the phallocentric patriarchy, a mandatory three-way split is clearly required to reflect the rich diversity of the New Jerusalem.
Perhaps the homosexual third might be further sub-divided into fems and butches. And obviously there should be seats (sic) reserved for cuprophiles, flagellants, transvestites and bondage devotees.
Although, come to think of it, that would probably increase the proportion of bog-standard heterosexuals in Parliament. The BBC would not approve. Let all tremblingly obey.