I'm going to be "simplistic" again.
Question: why is the campaign against the visit to Britain by Pope Benedict XVI spearheaded by prominent male homosexuals and their principal employer, the BBC?
Answer: because Pope Benedict XVI is the first pope to make a serious effort to curtail the influence of male homosexuals within the Roman Catholic church.
Question: what consistency is there between condemning the activities of predatory male homosexuals within the Roman Catholic church and the freedom to seduce boys demanded by male homosexual activists?
Answer: none whatsoever.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Oh dear, this will bring down upon you the full doom-laden fatwas of the Homintern. They are desperate to fight off any popular association of 'mature'(??) male homosexuality with the molestation of children.
ReplyDeleteSomehow, male homosexuality as per 'normal' is both 'genetic in origin' and also by 'free choice,' no matter how young the chosen partner.
This can scarcely be said of targeted children
even through the optimific propaganda about 'man/boy love' put about by e.g., Gore Vidal and others.
But still and all, the neurotic projection of their own narcissistic yearnings upon much younger men creates a kind of interface between
child molestation and homosexual desires which may be discerned by those not totally confused by current PC attitudes.
Of course the fear and loathing of gay men for
sexual congress with women is usually passed over in silence. The desire of pan-sexuals (anything that moves..) and bi-sexuals who like to dominate both sexes further complicates the scene.
So either everything or nothing can be equally described as sexually 'normal', right? Well, you make your own mind up, but I myself would not want to sign onto something like that - not if I had children or a conscience.
Gives "Backs to the wall" a new meaning, don't it?
ReplyDelete