21 September 2010

The Politics of Resentment

Title of a heart-felt article by Soothscribe Emeritus Thomas Sowell about the defeat of Adrian Henty, the highly effective black mayor of majority black Washington DC.
Mayor Adrian Fenty, under whom the murder rate has gone down and the school children's test scores have gone up, was resoundingly defeated for re-election. He was not simply a passive beneficiary of rising test scores and falling murder rates. He appointed Michelle Rhee as head of the school system and backed her as she fought the teachers' union and fired large numbers of ineffective teachers - something considered impossible in most cities across the country. Mayor Fenty also appointed the city's chief of police, Cathy Lanier, who has cracked down on hoodlumism, as well as crime.

Either one of these achievements would made mayors local heroes in most other cities. Why then was he clobbered in the election?

One key fact tells much of the story: Mayor Fenty received more than 70 percent of the white vote in Washington. His opponent received more than 80 percent of the black vote. Both men are black. But the head of the school system that he appointed is Asian and the chief of police is a white woman. More than that, most of the teachers who were fired were black. There were also bitter complaints that black contractors did not get as many of the contracts for doing business with the city as they expected.

In short, the mayor appointed the best people he could find, instead of running a racial patronage system, as a black mayor of a city with a black majority is apparently expected to do. He also didn't spend as much time schmoozing with the folks as was expected.
How did we reach the point where black voters put racial patronage and racial symbolism above the education of their children and the safety of everyone?

There are many reasons but one key factor was the creation, back in the 1960s, of a whole government-supported industry of race hustling. President Lyndon Johnson's "war on poverty" bankrolled all kinds of local "leaders" and organizations with the taxpayers' money, in the name of community "participation" in shaping the policies of government. These "leaders" and community activists have had every reason to hype racial resentments and to make issues "us" against "them."

One of the largely untold stories of our time has been the story of how ACORN, Jesse Jackson and other community activists have been able to transfer billions of dollars from banks to their own organizations' causes, with the aid of the federal government, exemplified by the Community Reinvestment Act and its sequels. Racial anger and racial resentments are the fuel that keeps this lucrative racket going.
This is precisely the trend accentuated by The One's core supporters, and what the "multiculturalism" pushed by the Labour pukes and their bought and paid for media allies have tried to recreate in Britain.

No comments:

Post a Comment